Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I don't see the problem at all. The -909 value is an implementation artefact, and the submitter probably wouldn't have known it existed without reading the source code. Perhaps we should change it to something different every Python release just to denote that it is deliberately undocumented.
Closing as "won't fix". ---------- nosy: +loewis resolution: -> wont fix status: open -> closed __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2844> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
