New submission from Christian Ullrich:

The item "A new installer for Windows has replaced the old MSI" appears on the 
"What's new" page as an "improvement". It is not. I disagree strongly with the 
decision to abandon MSI packages for Windows distribution in 3.5. This decision 
should be reversed immediately, if not sooner.

The .msi package format was introduced well over ten years ago. Since that day, 
there has been *no* excuse at all to distribute software for Windows in any 
other form (except "a simple ZIP will do").

The MSI file format's main advantage over ad-hoc executable installers or 
wrappers is in automated installation. There are several ways to deploy 
software in a corporate network, such as SCCM/SMS and GPO. While the former can 
deal with .exe packages, using MSIs is much simpler. In an MSI, the Feature 
table offers clear information about how to install only part of a product 
(ADDLOCAL=x,y,z either works as intended or fails cleanly). An .exe wrapper 
does not provide this information in an obvious way, instead, the user has to 
rely on external documentation to discover the installable features.

Python's Windows packages have been exemplary for years. This change needlessly 
gives up this reputation.

As far as the Universal CRT is concerned, for which there are no redist MSIs 
available, it should be clear that Python is not responsible for installing it, 
as it is a system component now. If ucrtbase.dll/KB2999226 is not present on 
the target system, the Python installation should simply abort and inform the 
user about the missing prerequisite.

(Also, as Microsoft is pushing it into the market at seemingly any cost, the 
market share of Windows 10 with included UCRT is likely to increase quickly, 
making the wrapper ever more unnecessary. Servers are, of course, another 
story.)

Finally, just in case there were any plans on display for the last several 
months: I do not usually venture into basements to check for leopards. Python's 
Windows packaging was perfectly fine, and there was no reason to assume that 
this would change, rather the opposite, in fact.

----------
components: Installation
messages: 250756
nosy: Christian.Ullrich
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: No single .msi available for 3.5 release
versions: Python 3.5

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25124>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to