Martin Panter added the comment: I’m not sure this is a good idea. IOBase is a base class, so adding to its API really means everybody’s subclasses may need to be updated to support the proper keyword argument names. Even ignoring classes outside Python’s standard library, it looks like you would need to update BufferedReader, FileIO, etc.
What is the reason you want to add keyword argument support? See also Issue 8706 about doing this in general to other functions. I can think of one or two weak reasons why this might be useful: * It allows swapping the arguments: file.seek(whence=SEEK_CUR, offset=+4) may be slightly more readable, because the offset has to be interpreted in the context of “whence”. * It could allow usage like functools.partial(file.seek, whence=SEEK_CUR)(offset) Also, making the offset default to zero might be useful for doing file.seek(whence=SEEK_END). If we do go ahead with this, it would need documenting (version changed note), and test cases. ---------- nosy: +martin.panter _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25057> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
