Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Xavier, thanks for the idea. It seems sensible and I considered applying this, but since this is an internal pdb test design change rather than a pdb bug fix, and two other tests seem candidates for the same change, I am going to leave it to Gerog or someone else to review. I do not understand the details of run_pdb, the reason why some tests use it and other inline a subprocess call, or why they all mix together stdout and stderr.
---------- components: +Tests nosy: +georg.brandl stage: -> patch review _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25013> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
