STINNER Victor added the comment: Sorry, I don't have time to read the whole discussion. Since we are *very* close to 3.5 final, I agree with Mark:
"Please revert c0d25de5919e. Breaking the interpreter in order to facilitate some obscure use case is unacceptable." We can reintroduce the feature in Python 3.6 with a longer discussion how to implement it, or ensure that we really want it. ---------- nosy: +haypo _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24912> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
