R. David Murray added the comment:

Thanks for the suggestion, but that would make programs using subprocess 
non-portable.  There is an open issue to use the *default* shell instead of 
hard coding it (because the sh-alike is not at /bin/sh on, eg, Android), but 
using the user shell would break lots of programs.  Your suggestion was brought 
up by a core dev (and rejected) in that issue (issue 16255)

----------
nosy: +r.david.murray
resolution:  -> duplicate
stage:  -> resolved
status: open -> closed
superseder:  -> subrocess.Popen needs /bin/sh but Android only has 
/system/bin/sh

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue24919>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to