R. David Murray added the comment: Thanks for the suggestion, but that would make programs using subprocess non-portable. There is an open issue to use the *default* shell instead of hard coding it (because the sh-alike is not at /bin/sh on, eg, Android), but using the user shell would break lots of programs. Your suggestion was brought up by a core dev (and rejected) in that issue (issue 16255)
---------- nosy: +r.david.murray resolution: -> duplicate stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed superseder: -> subrocess.Popen needs /bin/sh but Android only has /system/bin/sh _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24919> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com