Alex Grönholm added the comment: Sorry to keep you waiting. This sample code runs fine with the attached patch: https://gist.github.com/agronholm/43c71be0028bb866753a
In short, I implemented support for concurrent.futures in the asyncio Task class instead of making concurrent.futures aware of asyncio. The __await__ implementation in concurrent.futures closely mirrors that of asyncio's Future. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40090/asyncio_await.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24383> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
