Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > Since we're just trying to prevent this function from recursing > (indirectly) into itself, I think all of the logic can go here. > > What would you suggest the function _PyErr_InErrorProcessing do differently?
I was just thinking that this problem would probably come up again. > I think the real issue is: Does the additional logic and execution time > involved in adding per-thread state justify being "more correct", or can > we occasionally lose a warning message? Well, the first thing to check for is Py_Py3kWarning. Then do the extra logic and execution speed. __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2772> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
