Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > We need to look at more details why those fail. Perhaps there's one > common place where this is used? Did you add __length_hint__ yet?
I added __length_hint__ in the last patch. Many of the failures are the result of failings in seq_tests.py. As test_random points out, you can't pick a random integer from a set. Some of these failures are also the result of removing range slicing. (I'm not proposing we bring that back, though.) Overall though, I think it's more practical to have a length implementation that works in 99.78% cases than not and force people to to convert it to a list first. __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2735> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
