Ed Maste added the comment: Note that the patch in Issue24388 is more a proof of concept. I'm not sure it's the "right" fix.
LLDB is a bit of a special case: LLDB links against libedit, but the Python libedit module is built as if readline is in use. It turns out this "magically" works out, presumably due to the runtime workaround detection. As far as I know this issue would affect Linux as well, but perhaps the version of libedit on common Linux distributions is one with the 0-based vs 1-based history fix? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13501> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
