Joe Jevnik added the comment: > Why not index the slice type itself? slice[1:2]
I originally considered this and I personally really like this syntax, but I was concerned with ambiguity with the typing module > The only question in my mind is what slice should do when given just a single > index I think some of the power of this concept comes from the fact that I can express a complicated indexer without worrying about how it desugars. I would personally prefer being able to have this return tuples and scalars so that the syntax is easier to explain. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24379> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
