Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: ISTM, the only value added by next(g) is that it replaces g.next() with a more conventional spelling, g.__next__(). Since 2.6 still has g.next (),I don't see how this backport adds value. It does however create a second way to do it that will be confusing to some remaining in the 2.x world. I think we should avoid double spellings in 2.6 except in cases where the 2-to-3 converter would need help.
---------- nosy: +rhettinger __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2719> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
