Nick Coghlan added the comment: I'm OK with the patch as is, but I'm definitely concerned about the maintainability of inspect.signature in general.
I'm trying to decide if a block comment covering the order of calling protocols that we check, and where we potentially recurse, would be a help (by providing a map of the function for the benefit of future maintainers) or a hindrance (by providing the opportunity for that map to get out of sync) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24298> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
