R. David Murray added the comment:

Just in the what's new porting section, I think.  The fact that there "should" 
be very little to no code that relies on this is why I'd like to see it fixed.  
The fact that the report was a theoretical one, and not one that broke code, is 
why I think we should fix it only in 3.5.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue24284>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to