ndbecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
On Monday 28 April 2008, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
> > IIUC, current ioctl is not capable of handling arbitrary argument
> > types.
>
> Can you please be a bit more explicit? What limitation do you see in
> fcntl.ioctl, and how does this fragment overcome the limitation?
> AFAICT, they do exactly the same thing.
>
In the example I gave, the ioctl passes a structure:
class eos_dl_args_t (Structure):
_fields_ = [("length", c_ulong),
("data", c_void_p)]
AFAIK, there is no way to do that with fcntl.ioctl, is there?
__________________________________
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2712>
__________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
