Guido van Rossum added the comment: (To clarify, the PEP itself probably serves as enough documentation in the interim.)
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > Yeah, but the docs don't need to be committed in time for beta 1. The > source code should go in ASAP, especially since the PEP 492 changes will > have to be merged in on top of them. @Thomas: which Monday were you > shooting for? I had hoped yesterday... > > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Benjamin Peterson <rep...@bugs.python.org> > wrote: > >> >> Benjamin Peterson added the comment: >> >> It certainly would be nice to have documentation. >> >> ---------- >> >> _______________________________________ >> Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> >> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2292> >> _______________________________________ >> > > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2292> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
