Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Describing generator functions as such is a great idea. But how about
<generator function f at 0x7f7dad9f7bf8>
Marking closure functions as such is a bit more subtle. However, there ia a
real point that closure functions have a hidden input. If it is mutated or
rebound, the function will not be deterministic with respect to its overt input
arguments. Closure functions are similar to methods in this respect.
Await functions (Guido's name choice as of today), if the PEP is approved, will
also need to be identified as such. I propose a uniform format of no prefix, a
single prefic or a (tuple) of prefixes.
----------
nosy: +terry.reedy
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue24056>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
