Nick Coghlan added the comment: As far as Alex's post goes, it's simply wrong, and I wish he had spoken to me about his frustrations with the significant challenges of infrastructure maintenance in large established organisations before posting it. Red Hat's been fighting the battle for better enterprise infrastructure management for 20 years at this point (including in the US public sector: https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/industries/government), but like almost all institutional reform, it's very slow going.
We offer plenty of options for folks to upgrade faster, and it's much easier for us when they do: http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2015/04/stop-supporting-python26.html So if you care about getting security enhancements rolled out in a way that means people responsible for infrastructure management in large organisations will actually adopt them, rather than dismissing them out of hand as "too risky", please take a moment to consider that we might have some idea what we're talking about. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23857> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
