Guido van Rossum added the comment: Yeah, I'd like to see it restored in asyncio. It seems to be just one file that's currently out of sync with the tulip "upstream" repo.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Serhiy Storchaka <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: > > Should I restore __ne__ in asyncio? The version without __ne__ will work > with Python 3.4.3 because issue21408 patch was committed in 3.4 too. > Explicit __ne__ implementation is just redundant. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue23326> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23326> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
