Petr Viktorin added the comment: Making it a function might help with the following issues: - series of comparisons and PyBool_FromLong is less efficient than switch and Py_RETURN_*. But it would add a function call. - it might be too complex for a macro
Do you think that would help? As for the signature, I would like this to mirror richcmpfunc and PyObject_RichCompareBool. And returning PyObjexct*, not 0/1, is an important part of reducing boilerplate; in cases where 0/1 would be helpful you can easily work with cmp-style -1/0/1 values before using this to convert them. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23699> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
