STINNER Victor added the comment:

"With the pystate_cplusplus.patch I was able to compile both min_example.tar.gz 
and my actual extension.  So I with your patch, it does work.  Thank you."

Cool! I applied this simple patch instead of trying to write an ugly glue in 
pyatomic.h between C and C++.

C and C++ simply look to be incompatible for handling atomic types :-/ The good 
news is that we don't them atomic types for Python extensions, only to compile 
Python core.

Thanks for the report. I prefer to detect such annoying issue before a ".0" 
release (3.5.0). FYI it's a regression introduced by the issue #22038 which 
started to use <stdatomic.h> (but it's now fixed).

----------
resolution:  -> fixed
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue23644>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to