Martin Panter added the comment:

Regarding unparsing of "////evil.com", see Issue 23505, where the invalid 
behaviour is pointed out as a security issue. This was one of the bugs that 
motivated me to make this patch. I cannot imagine some existing code (other 
than an exploit) that would be broken by restoring the empty “//” component; do 
you have an example?

Why do you think the asterisks (*) in the Split/ParseResult signatures are 
misleading? I am trying to document that the has_ flags are keyword-only 
parameters. I avoided making them positional parameters, as they are not part 
of the underlying tuple object.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22852>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to