Michael Klein added the comment:
I found a simpler one, like Amaury's eval("+1" * 748580):
def f(x):
y = x+x+x+x+x
return y
print f(0)
(Except there are 74875 x+'s. This is exactly enough for a segfault, one less
runs fine.)
I've tried something like:
loopcount = 0
loopcount += (1-a36)*(a37)*(1-a41)
...
return loopcount
It works, but it's still pretty slow. (At least it doesn't crash.) I tried
converting to C with Cython, but it's too big to be processed in a reasonable
amount of time, but this is irrelevant to the bug.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue23643>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
