New submission from ThiefMaster:
>>> d = {'1': '2'}
>>> {'1'} < d.keys()
False
>>> {'1'} < set(d.values())
False
>>> {'1'} < d.values()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: unorderable types: set() < dict_values()
Same for e.g. the `-` operator.
Since dict_keys acts like a real set I think dict_values should do so, too. At
least if all the values are hashable.
----------
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 234888
nosy: ThiefMaster
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: dict_values should be comparable with a set
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.4
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue23339>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
