Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Actually set_find_free_slot() is not needed because there is
set_insert_clean(). Results with using set_insert_clean():
$ ./python -m timeit -s "s = set(range(10**4))" -- "frozenset(s)"
Unpatched: 1000 loops, best of 3: 700 usec per loop
Patched: 1000 loops, best of 3: 570 usec per loop
Speed up: 23%
$ ./python -m timeit -s "s = {i+(j<<64) for i in range(10**4//2) for j in
range(2)}" -- "frozenset(s)"
Unpatched: 100 loops, best of 3: 2.2 msec per loop
Patched: 1000 loops, best of 3: 765 usec per loop
Speed up: 188%
$ ./python -m timeit -s "s = set(range(10**4)); s.add(-1); s.discard(-1)" --
"frozenset(s)"
Unpatched: 1000 loops, best of 3: 700 usec per loop
Patched: 1000 loops, best of 3: 605 usec per loop
Speed up: 16%
$ ./python -m timeit -s "s = {i+(j<<64) for i in range(10**4//2) for j in
range(2)}; s.add(-1); s.discard(-1)" -- "frozenset(s)"
Unpatched: 100 loops, best of 3: 2.2 msec per loop
Patched: 1000 loops, best of 3: 1.06 msec per loop
Speed up: 108%
Note that unpatched version is 6% slower now than before, perhaps due to
issue23119.
----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file37878/set_faster_copy_3.patch
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue23290>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
