STINNER Victor added the comment: Copy of the feature requets by Guido van Rossum: https://code.google.com/p/tulip/issues/detail?id=96
Often you want to stop servicing (or using) a connection when there is no activity in a given time. You can do this by wrapping all your read calls in wait_for(), but a single readline() or readexactly() call may do multiple I/O operations and typically you want to reset the timeout whenever you receive some more bytes. So it makes more sense to either add the timeout to the various read*() calls, or even to (optionally) set it in the constructor, so that the class can implement a more subtle timeout algorithm. I could imagine an overall timeout too, and possibly even something that gives up if the bandwidth goes below a threshold, to avoid waiting forever on a huge download. (For StreamWriter I think it's sufficient to call wait_for(w.drain()), so I think this only applies to StreamReader.) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23236> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
