Josh Cogliati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Hm. Well, after filing the bug, I created a thread for each subprocess, and had that thread do an wait on the process, and that worked fine. So, I guess at minimum it sounds like the documentation for poll could be improved to mention that it will not catch the state if something else does. I think a better fix would be for poll to return some kind of UnknownError instead of None if the process was finished, but python did not catch it for some reason (like using os.wait() :)
__________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2475> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
