R. David Murray added the comment: Thanks for wanting to contribute. However, I don't see why this function would be beneficial. As indicated by the patch, it is simply
''.join(str(map_function(x)) for x in iterable) but without the inherent flexibility of the above formulation. Which looks pretty Pythonic to my eyes :). We often say "not every one line expression deserves to be a function." But yes, python-ideas would be the appropriate forum to discuss such a thing. This issue can be reopened if you get consensus that it is a valuable addition. ---------- nosy: +r.david.murray resolution: -> later stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23179> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
