Philip Jenvey added the comment: I can't find the paper trail of what I originally thought was a "consensus" or even that many clear pronouncements about it, but I recall Nick being originally opposed to it but he later changed his mind, you can see his approval here:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-May/125809.html 'It's also quite likely the "rich stat object" API will be pursued for 3.5' https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-November/130582.html https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-November/130588.html Antoine seems ok w/ it, encouraging others to make it happen: https://mail.python.org/pipermail//python-dev/2013-September/128708.html You can probably find a bit more discussion within those threads ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue19725> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
