Raymond Hettinger added the comment: > treat the hi in the precondition in the same way as the lo parameter
Originally, there was no special test for lo. The test was added only because negative lo value failed in an unfortunate way (with an infinite loop). No change to hi was made because (it succeeded in some cases and existing code might be relying on that or it failed in clear-cut way by raising an IndexError). > That being said, from my point of view this ticket can be closed. I concur. When there isn't a clear case for change, it is usually better to favor stability over potential disruption. ---------- resolution: -> rejected status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22683> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
