gladman added the comment:
You might be right that it is not worth adding the ability to handle a variable
number of parameters in the new gcd. But this depends on whether you are right
that this would add a significant burden to the implementation. I am not sure
that it would.
But for pure Python implementations of gcd and gcdm:
def gcd(a, b):
while b:
a, b = b, a % b
return a
def gcdm(a, *r):
for b in r:
while b:
a, b = b, a % b
return a
using the second of these alone when compared with the first plus reduce on a
10000 length sequence of random numbers in 0 <= r < 10 ** 12 gives speed
improvement of over 25%.
And, since we are looking for speed improvements, a further possible 25% is a
worthwhile gain for a common pattern of gcd use. Which is why I believe it is
worth asking the question.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22477>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
