R. David Murray added the comment: Agreed. If you want it to be a singleton in your code, use the singleton pattern in your code...but it is hard for me to see why that would be a good idea :) (ie: DRY). Globally, it does not seem to me that there are likely to be any significant number of identical definitions in non-related codebases, even absent the mutable-class issue.
---------- nosy: +r.david.murray resolution: -> rejected stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22562> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
