Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: This issue seems to have foundered on finding an explanation for the finer points of super(). Perhaps the glaring errors could at least be corrected, or the fine points could be omitted or glossed over? For example change the first sentence of the docs to "Returns a proxy for the type following 'type' in the method resolution order of 'object-or-type'."
Perhaps link to these? http://chandlerproject.org/bin/view/Projects/UsingSuper http://fuhm.net/super-harmful/ ---------- nosy: +kjohnson _____________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1163367> _____________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
