New submission from Dima Tisnek:
$ python2 -c 'import datetime; print datetime.time(10, 44, 11).strftime("%s")'
-2208955189
$ python3 -c 'import datetime; print (datetime.time(10, 44, 11).strftime("%s"))'
-2208955189
So apparently, datetime.time(...).strftime("%s") semantically "seconds since
unix epoch" assumes Jan 1, 1900 for missing date part.
However datetime module doesn't allow subtracting time objects, i.e. no
assumption of date is made, where "same date" chould be reasonable.
----------
components: Extension Modules
messages: 226224
nosy: Dima.Tisnek
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: odd result for datetime.time.strftime("%s")
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.4
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22321>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
