Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Raymond, do you have time for the review? It will be easier to support both implementation at the same time, than change only Python implementation and asynchronously update the patch with the risk to lost changes in C implementation.
I think we should increase the priority of this issue. Efficient lru_cache will affect other parts of the stdlib. In particular the use of lru_cache was withdrawed in the re module due to large overhead of Python implementation. The ipaddress module now uses own specialized implementation of the caching instead of general lru_cache for the same reason. Issue13299 proposition will be more acceptable with faster lru_cache. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14373> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
