STINNER Victor added the comment: > This has been fixed in 3.4.2, but shows up in the 3.4.1 documentation.
Well, I didn't want to change Python 3.4.1 documentation, but it looks like https://docs.python.org/3.4/ is updated after each commit into the 3.4 branch. For example, new asyncio functions added in 3.4.2 are already documented: https://docs.python.org/3.4/library/asyncio-eventloop.html#asyncio.BaseEventLoop.create_task I changeed all examples to use create_task() instaed of async() or the Task contructor: changeset: 91609:66f06fbf8a2f branch: 3.4 user: Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> date: Tue Jul 08 12:39:10 2014 +0200 files: Doc/library/asyncio-dev.rst Doc/library/asyncio-eventloop.rst Doc/library/asyncio-stream.r description: Update asyncio documentation - Document the new create_task() method - "Hide" the Task class: point to the create_task() method for interoperability - Rewrite the documentation of the Task class - Document the "Pending task destroyed" - Update output in debug mode of examples in the dev section - Replace Task() with create_task() in examples Maybe I should revert this change in the 3.4 branch, but mention that Python 3.4.2 and 3.5 have a new create_task() which is now the recommanded way to schedule a coroutine (to create a task object). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22112> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
