Ronald Oussoren added the comment: The last draf of ISO C '11: <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1570.pdf>.
This says that _Bool is large enough to store 0 and 1, and that conversion of any integer data to _Bool results in 0 or 1. If I interpret the document correctly there is no conforming way to create a value of _Bool that has a value other than 0 or 1, and that should mean clang's behavior is not a bug. BTW. I haven't tested my patch on a PPC system yet (where sizeof(bool) != 1), and won't be able to do so until I'm back home (I'm currently at EuroPython) ---------- keywords: +needs review, patch stage: -> patch review _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22012> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
