Guido van Rossum added the comment: The more esoteric system calls you use the more you end up debugging it on esoteric platforms. :-(
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:17 AM, STINNER Victor <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > STINNER Victor added the comment: > > > I don't know if it can be useful, but there is also the > signal.pthread_sigmask() which can be used to "queue" pending signals. (...) > > Oh, I didn't remember that I opened the issue #12060 to discuss "real time > signals". The summary is that the wakeup fd should be used... Which is nice > because it is the choice made by asyncio ;-) > > FYI I also opened the issue #21998: "asyncio: a new self-pipe should be > created in the child process after fork" which is somehow related to this > issue. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue21645> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21645> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
