Robin Schoonover added the comment: I agree, the current patch is too permissive.
Both a server I wrote a while ago, and most other "complaint" servers deal with the problem the exact same way as that patch, and that extra permissiveness led to my misinterpretation when analyzing why I had made that original change. In any case, I've attached an updated patch. ---------- resolution: not a bug -> status: closed -> open title: wsgiref.simple_server doesn't accept empty bytes before start_response is called -> wsgiref.simple_server sends headers on empty bytes Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35835/wsgiref-empty-byte-2.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21890> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
