R. David Murray added the comment:

Thanks, Maciej. 

I tweaked the patch a bit, you might want to take a look just for your own 
information.  Mostly I fixed the warning stuff, which I didn't explain very 
well.  The idea is that if the default is used (no value is specified), we want 
there to be a warning.  But if a value *is* specified, there should be no 
warning (the user knows what they want).  To accomplish that we make the actual 
default value None, and check for that.  I also had to modify the tests so that 
warnings aren't issued, as well as test that they actually get issued when the 
default is used.

I also added versionchanged directives and a whatsnew entry, and expanded the 
decode_data docs a bit.

----------
resolution:  -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19662>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to