donald petravick added the comment: Ok. I have a subclass with a copied out - then-modified wait method. ¹twill do for now. I¹m clueless as to what the windows analog of wait4() would be.
On 5/30/14, 3:10 PM, "R. David Murray" <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > >R. David Murray added the comment: > >I think the answer is that if you want that level of control you can't >use communicate, you have to implement what you specifically need. > >I'm going to close this as rejected. It could be reopened if someone can >find a way to propose something that makes sense cross-platform. > >---------- >nosy: +r.david.murray >resolution: -> rejected >stage: -> resolved >status: open -> closed > >_______________________________________ >Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> ><http://bugs.python.org/issue21504> >_______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21504> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
