Charles-François Natali added the comment: That could make sense, dunno.
Note that the bz2 module uses a harcoded 8K value. Note that the buffer size should probably be passed to the open() call. Also, the allocation is quite peculiar: it uses an exponential buffer size, starting at a tiny value: 202 # Starts small, scales exponentially 203 self.min_readsize = 100 In short, I think the overall buffering should be rewritten :-) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20962> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
