STINNER Victor added the comment: > I know that an earlier request to use nanosleep() has been rejected as > "wontfix"
It was the issue #13981. I created this issue while I worked on the PEP 410 (nanosecond timestamp). I closed the issue myself, it doesn't mean that Python must not use the function, just that I didn't want to work on it anymore at this time. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21302> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
