Alexander Belopolsky added the comment:
Paul,
You are right. I misunderstood that comment myself. I've tried the
attached modification to your patch (unreachable-code-1.diff) and it
passes all tests while fixing msg62953 problem:
$ cat t.py
def f():
return 1
1+2
from dis import dis
dis(f)
$ ./python.exe t.py
6 0 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
3 RETURN_VALUE
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9556/unreachable-code-1.diff
__________________________________
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1394>
__________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
