Mark Lawrence added the comment: >From PEP 453 "Abstract - This PEP proposes that the Installing Python Modules >guide in Python 2.7, 3.3 and 3.4 be updated to officially recommend the use of >pip as the default installer for Python packages, and that appropriate >technical changes be made in Python 3.4 to provide pip by default in support >of that recommendation." If this is the *RECOMMENDED* default installer what >are the bad ones like? Note the bit "appropriate technical changes be made in >Python 3.4". As this is an officially endorsed product quite specifically >targetted at Python 3.4, slap bang in the middle of a release candidate I >don't expect to see core devs waffling on about what we'll do the future, I >expect to see fixes now or have this product officially withdrawn from 3.4.
---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20846> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
