Eric V. Smith added the comment: I still think this is a special case that we won't "fix". And even if we did, you'd have to wait until 3.5.
But instead of your solution, it might be easier to wrap your floats in a class that implements your version of format, based on float's format with some post-processing: class MyFloat(float): def __format__(self, fmt): s = float.__format__(self, fmt) if s[1] == '0': return s[0] + s[2:] return s print(format(MyFloat(0.12345678), '+8.8')) print(format(MyFloat(1.12345678), '+8.8')) gives: +.12345678 +1.1234568 I've grossly simplified __format__, of course. And I'm using built-in format() instead of ''.format() (because it's less typing), but they use the same mechanisms. So: print('{}:"{:+10.8}"'.format('answer', MyFloat(0.12345678))) gives: answer:"+.12345678" ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20811> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com