Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment: Are you referring to the Py_LOCAL_INLINE macro? I see that we have no Py_INLINE. Py_LOCAL_INLINE includes the "static" qualifier, and in fact, if there is no "USE_INLINE" defined, then all that it does is to add "static".
Would having a "Py_INLINE(type)" macro, that is the same, but without the static (except when USE_INLINE is false) make a difference? It would be a bit odd to have Py_LOCAL_INLINE() functions defined in the headers. I'm not sure that there is any practical difference between "static inline" and "inline". But there is a difference between "static" and "inline". It would be great if we could start writing stuff like the Py_INCREF() and Py_DECREF() as functions rather than macros, but for this to happen we must be able to trust that they are really inlined. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20440> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
