New submission from Nick Coghlan: Peter, with issue 18805 fixed, what do you think about removing the provisional status from the ipaddress API?
Aside from issue 19157 (where I'm not sure the behaviour even needs changing), the other open ipaddress issues appear to be docs related or RFEs. At this point, making ipaddress subject to the usual backwards compatibility guarantees seems fairly low risk. ---------- assignee: pmoody messages: 210641 nosy: larry, ncoghlan, pmoody priority: normal severity: normal stage: commit review status: open title: Mark ipaddress as stable? type: enhancement versions: Python 3.3, Python 3.4 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20563> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
