Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Paul:
> well, pystone has limits to its "scientificity", it's more like quick- > run-anywhere, there's pybench for "real" testing (it's maintained and > supported I hope) pybench is so synthetic it's almost a nano-benchmark. I would suggest using the benchmarks suite, which will give more useful numbers IMHO: http://hg.python.org/benchmarks/ ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20475> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
