Charles-François Natali added the comment: > > Once again: a slight early wakeup isn't an issue > > That's your opinion, but I disagree. > > Please open a new issue with a patch, or reopen at least this issue because > it is now closed. > > I already spent to much time on this issue. Buildbots are now happy, I don't > want to change this again.
So, to sum up: - you write a fragile and unelegant patch without a good reason - you commit it without review - you're asked several times to provide an example of the problems your patch is supposed to solve, but don't give any - you don't take into account the fact that all proven and successful event loops work just fine without a similar patch - you insist, and won't neither back your claims by examples, nor revert your patch Fine, keep it this way, but I'm done with this, I've lost enough time. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20311> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
